Automation is part of the browser workspace
Automation Studio, User Scripts, Browser API/Puppeteer and MCP AI can all work around persistent Social Browser Profiles.
Browser comparison
Compare the products by workflow and product architecture. Octo Browser may be a better fit when you specifically need its fingerprint/profile product model, team access controls, cross-platform/Android profile options or its commercial API workflow.
Comparison
Use this as a workflow comparison, not a claim that either product is universally better.
| Capability | Social Browser | Octo Browser |
|---|---|---|
| Persistent separate profiles | Yes | Dedicated persistent browser profiles |
| Per-profile proxy workflow | Yes | Profile proxy configuration |
| Built-in Automation Studio | Yes | API/framework automation rather than Social Browser Automation Studio |
| MCP AI browser control | Yes | Not the primary documented integration path |
| User Scripts | Built in | Automation via API/frameworks |
| Compatible extensions | Yes | Supported browser customization varies |
| Local-first Profile data | Default | Product-specific profile storage/transfer model |
| Cross-platform desktop/mobile | Windows 64-bit currently | Windows/macOS profile options and Android profile configurations documented |
Overview
Automation Studio, User Scripts, Browser API/Puppeteer and MCP AI can all work around persistent Social Browser Profiles.
Persistent Profile data is local on the device by default.
The free browser starts with up to 10 Profiles without signup.
Overview
Octo Browser may be a better fit when you specifically need its fingerprint/profile product model, team access controls, cross-platform/Android profile options or its commercial API workflow.
Official references
Competitor capabilities can change by release and plan. These official sources were checked for this comparison.
Try it
Choose the product that matches the work you actually need to operate.